↓ Skip to main content

Skeptical Employers: Experimental Evidence on Biased Beliefs Constraining Firm Growth

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Economics & Statistics, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Skeptical Employers: Experimental Evidence on Biased Beliefs Constraining Firm Growth
Published in
Review of Economics & Statistics, September 2024
DOI 10.1162/rest_a_01219
Authors

Stefano A. Caria, Paolo Falco

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,886,506
of 26,623,241 outputs
Outputs from Review of Economics & Statistics
#656
of 3,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,457
of 157,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Economics & Statistics
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.