The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Skeptical Employers: Experimental Evidence on Biased Beliefs Constraining Firm Growth
|
---|---|
Published in |
Review of Economics & Statistics, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1162/rest_a_01219 |
Authors |
Stefano A. Caria, Paolo Falco |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 23% |
Denmark | 5 | 16% |
France | 2 | 6% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 15 | 48% |
Members of the public | 15 | 48% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
Researcher | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,886,506
of 26,623,241 outputs
Outputs from Review of Economics & Statistics
#656
of 3,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,457
of 157,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Economics & Statistics
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.