↓ Skip to main content

Gold nanoparticles for cancer radiotherapy: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Nanotechnology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 218)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
497 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gold nanoparticles for cancer radiotherapy: a review
Published in
Cancer Nanotechnology, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12645-016-0021-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaspar Haume, Soraia Rosa, Sophie Grellet, Małgorzata A. Śmiałek, Karl T. Butterworth, Andrey V. Solov’yov, Kevin M. Prise, Jon Golding, Nigel J. Mason

Abstract

Radiotherapy is currently used in around 50% of cancer treatments and relies on the deposition of energy directly into tumour tissue. Although it is generally effective, some of the deposited energy can adversely affect healthy tissue outside the tumour volume, especially in the case of photon radiation (gamma and X-rays). Improved radiotherapy outcomes can be achieved by employing ion beams due to the characteristic energy deposition curve which culminates in a localised, high radiation dose (in form of a Bragg peak). In addition to ion radiotherapy, novel sensitisers, such as nanoparticles, have shown to locally increase the damaging effect of both photon and ion radiation, when both are applied to the tumour area. Amongst the available nanoparticle systems, gold nanoparticles have become particularly popular due to several advantages: biocompatibility, well-established methods for synthesis in a wide range of sizes, and the possibility of coating of their surface with a large number of different molecules to provide partial control of, for example, surface charge or interaction with serum proteins. This gives a full range of options for design parameter combinations, in which the optimal choice is not always clear, partially due to a lack of understanding of many processes that take place upon irradiation of such complicated systems. In this review, we summarise the mechanisms of action of radiation therapy with photons and ions in the presence and absence of nanoparticles, as well as the influence of some of the core and coating design parameters of nanoparticles on their radiosensitisation capabilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 497 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 493 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 20%
Student > Master 79 16%
Student > Bachelor 76 15%
Researcher 43 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 4%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 118 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 67 13%
Physics and Astronomy 61 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 10%
Engineering 35 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 6%
Other 112 23%
Unknown 139 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,128,663
of 23,931,222 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Nanotechnology
#11
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,926
of 315,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Nanotechnology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,931,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.