You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic information infrastructure after the deluge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2010-11-7-402 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julian Parkhill, Ewan Birney, Paul Kersey |
| Abstract |
Maintaining up-to-date annotation on reference genomes is becoming more important, not less, as the ability to rapidly and cheaply resequence genomes expands. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 71 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 41% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
| Professor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 71% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,804,755
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,156
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,489
of 169,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#28
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.