↓ Skip to main content

Male fetal loss in the U.S. following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Male fetal loss in the U.S. following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim A Bruckner, Ralph Catalano, Jennifer Ahern

Abstract

The secondary sex ratio (i.e., the odds of a male birth) reportedly declines following natural disasters, pollution events, and economic collapse. It remains unclear whether this decline results from an excess of male fetal loss or reduced male conceptions. The literature also does not converge as to whether the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 induced "communal bereavement", or the widespread feeling of distress among persons who never met those directly involved in the attacks. We test the communal bereavement hypothesis among gravid women by examining whether male fetal deaths rose above expected levels in the US following September 11, 2001.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Psychology 11 13%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#744,524
of 23,660,057 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#761
of 15,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,081
of 97,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,660,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.