You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating carotenoids are associated with favorable lipid and fatty acid profiles in an older population at high cardiovascular risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.967967 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María Marhuenda-Muñoz, Inés Domínguez-López, Klaus Langohr, Anna Tresserra-Rimbau, Miguel Ángel Martínez González, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Dolores Corella, María Dolores Zomeño, J. Alfredo Martínez, Angel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, Jesús Vioque, Dora Romaguera, José López-Miranda, Ramón Estruch, Francisco J. Tinahones, José Lapetra, Ll. Serra-Majem, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Josep A. Tur, Vicente Martín-Sánchez, Xavier Pintó, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Lidia Daimiel, Emilio Ros, Estefanía Toledo, María Fernández de la Puente Cervera, Rocío Barragán, Montse Fitó, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, Enrique Gómez-Gracia, Juan Manuel Zazo, Marga Morey, Antonio García-Ríos, Rosa Casas, Ana M. Gómez-Pérez, José Manuel Santos-Lozano, Zenaida Vázquez-Ruiz, Alessandro Atzeni, Eva M. Asensio, M. Mar Gili-Riu, Vanessa Bullon, Anai Moreno-Rodriguez, Oscar Lecea, Nancy Babio, Francesca Peñas Lopez, Guadalupe Gómez Melis, Rosa M. Lamuela-Raventós |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 86% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,933,717
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#861
of 5,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,046
of 439,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#63
of 636 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 636 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.