↓ Skip to main content

Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine: Novel Therapies and Clinical Management

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine: Novel Therapies and Clinical Management
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine: Novel Therapies and Clinical Management
Chapter number 11
Book title
Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine: Novel Therapies and Clinical Management
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24932-2_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-924931-5, 978-3-31-924932-2
Authors

Gadgeel, Shirish M, Shirish M. Gadgeel M.D., Shirish M. Gadgeel, Gadgeel, Shirish M.

Editors

Aamir Ahmad, Shirish M. Gadgeel

Abstract

Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer related deaths in both men and women in the United States and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for over 85 % of all lung cancers. Survival of these patients has not significantly altered in over 30 years. This chapter initially discusses the clinical presentation of lung cancer patients. Most patients diagnosed with lung cancer due to symptoms have advanced stage cancer. Once diagnosed, lung cancer patients need imaging studies to assess the stage of the disease before decisions regarding therapy are finalized. The most important prognostic factors are stage of the disease and performance status and these factors also determine therapy. The chapter subsequently discusses management of each stage of the disease and the impact of several pathologic, clinical factors in personalizing therapy for each individual patient. Transition from chemotherapy for every patient to a more personalized approach based on histology and molecular markers has occurred in the management of advanced stage NSCLC. It is expected that such a personalized approach will extend to all stages of NSCLC and will likely improve the outcomes of all NSCLC patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 26%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,480,713
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,230
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,845
of 390,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#118
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.