| Title |
Recognizing the equity implications of restoration priority maps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ac9918 |
| Authors |
Bill Schultz, Dan Brockington, Eric A Coleman, Ida Djenontin, Harry W Fischer, Forrest Fleischman, Prakash Kashwan, Kristina Marquardt, Marion Pfeifer, Rose Pritchard, Vijay Ramprasad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 17% |
| Sweden | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 50% |
| Scientists | 49 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#543,127
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#816
of 6,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,281
of 442,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#17
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.