↓ Skip to main content

Cognition-based interventions for healthy older people and people with mild cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognition-based interventions for healthy older people and people with mild cognitive impairment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006220.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mike Martin, Linda Clare, Anne Mareike Altgassen, Michelle H Cameron, Franzisca Zehnder

Abstract

Evidence from some, but not all non-randomised studies suggest the possibility that cognitive training may influence cognitive functioning in older people. Due to the differences among cognitive training interventions reported in the literature, giving a general overview of the current literature remains difficult.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 320 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 18%
Student > Master 55 16%
Researcher 44 13%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Other 71 21%
Unknown 41 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 111 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 8%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Neuroscience 18 5%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 57 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2017.
All research outputs
#862,111
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,256
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,916
of 161,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.