The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Integrating principles and tools of decision science into value‐driven watershed planning for compensatory mitigation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Applications, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/eap.2766 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Georgina M. Sanchez, Mitchell J. Eaton, Ana M. Garcia, Jennifer Keisman, Kirsten Ullman, James Blackwell, Ross K. Meentemeyer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Librarian | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 18 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,546,566
of 25,117,541 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#873
of 3,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,868
of 475,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#27
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,117,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.