You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002779.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roddy McMillan, Heli Forssell, John AG Buchanan, Anne‐Marie Glenny, Jo C Weldon, Joanna M Zakrzewska |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 13% |
Spain | 9 | 11% |
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 5% |
Chile | 4 | 5% |
Canada | 3 | 4% |
Japan | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Colombia | 2 | 3% |
Ireland | 2 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 19% |
Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 51 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 23% |
Scientists | 10 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 493 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 82 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 64 | 13% |
Researcher | 48 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 3% |
Other | 74 | 15% |
Unknown | 164 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 169 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 7% |
Psychology | 29 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
Other | 61 | 12% |
Unknown | 174 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#638,969
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,155
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,925
of 417,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.