You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the effectiveness of preconception interventions in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nishadi N Withanage, Jessica R Botfield, Sonia Srinivasan, Kirsten I Black, Danielle Mazza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 15 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 63% |
| Scientists | 8 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#552,146
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#233
of 4,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,741
of 431,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#8
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.