↓ Skip to main content

Cranberries for treating urinary tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cranberries for treating urinary tract infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1998
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth G Jepson, Lara Mihaljevic, Jonathan C Craig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 21%
Student > Master 11 13%
Other 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 23 27%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 9 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2020.
All research outputs
#601,729
of 14,510,247 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,735
of 10,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,399
of 150,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,510,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.