↓ Skip to main content

Complex phylogenetic distribution of a non-canonical genetic code in green algae

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complex phylogenetic distribution of a non-canonical genetic code in green algae
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-327
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Cocquyt, Gillian H Gile, Frederik Leliaert, Heroen Verbruggen, Patrick J Keeling, Olivier De Clerck

Abstract

A non-canonical nuclear genetic code, in which TAG and TAA have been reassigned from stop codons to glutamine, has evolved independently in several eukaryotic lineages, including the ulvophycean green algal orders Dasycladales and Cladophorales. To study the phylogenetic distribution of the standard and non-canonical genetic codes, we generated sequence data of a representative set of ulvophycean green algae and used a robust green algal phylogeny to evaluate different evolutionary scenarios that may account for the origin of the non-canonical code.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 17%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,228,987
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,069
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,388
of 108,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#12
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.