You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In-depth characterisation of a cohort of individuals with missense and loss-of-function variants disruptingFOXP2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Genetics, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jmg-2022-108734 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lottie D Morison, Elisabeth Meffert, Miriam Stampfer, Irene Steiner-Wilke, Brigitte Vollmer, Katrin Schulze, Tracy Briggs, Ruth Braden, Adam Vogel, Daisy Thompson-Lake, Chirag Patel, Edward Blair, Himanshu Goel, Samantha Turner, Ute Moog, Angelika Riess, Frederique Liegeois, David A Koolen, David J Amor, Tjitske Kleefstra, Simon E Fisher, Christiane Zweier, Angela T Morgan |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 72% |
| Scientists | 7 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 36% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,289,596
of 23,914,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#86
of 3,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,612
of 430,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#8
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,914,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.