↓ Skip to main content

In-depth characterisation of a cohort of individuals with missense and loss-of-function variants disrupting FOXP2

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Genetics, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In-depth characterisation of a cohort of individuals with missense and loss-of-function variants disrupting FOXP2
Published in
Journal of Medical Genetics, November 2022
DOI 10.1136/jmg-2022-108734
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lottie D Morison, Elisabeth Meffert, Miriam Stampfer, Irene Steiner-Wilke, Brigitte Vollmer, Katrin Schulze, Tracy Briggs, Ruth Braden, Adam Vogel, Daisy Thompson-Lake, Chirag Patel, Edward Blair, Himanshu Goel, Samantha Turner, Ute Moog, Angelika Riess, Frederique Liegeois, David A Koolen, David J Amor, Tjitske Kleefstra, Simon E Fisher, Christiane Zweier, Angela T Morgan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Psychology 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,491,418
of 26,616,237 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#94
of 3,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,769
of 448,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,616,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.