↓ Skip to main content

Liver abscess and bacteremia caused by lactobacillus: role of probiotics? Case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Liver abscess and bacteremia caused by lactobacillus: role of probiotics? Case report and review of the literature
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12876-016-0552-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammed Sherid, Salih Samo, Samian Sulaiman, Husein Husein, Humberto Sifuentes, Subbaramiah Sridhar

Abstract

Lactobacilli are non-spore forming, lactic acid producing, gram-positive rods. They are a part of the normal gastrointestinal and genitourinary microbiota and have rarely been reported to be the cause of infections. Lactobacilli species are considered non-pathogenic organisms and have been used as probiotics to prevent antibiotic associated diarrhea. There are sporadic reported cases of infections related to lactobacilli containing probiotics. In this paper we discuss a case of an 82 year old female with liver abscess and bacteremia from lactobacillus after using probiotics containing lactobacilli in the course of her treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis. The Lactobacillus strain identification was not performed and therefore, both commensal microbiota and the probiotic product should be considered as possible sources of the strain. Lactobacilli can lead to bacteremia and liver abscesses in some susceptible persons and greater awareness of this potential side effect is warranted with the increasing use of probiotics containing lactobacilli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 42 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2020.
All research outputs
#20,166,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#1,241
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,855
of 417,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.