You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/ard-2022-223356 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josef S Smolen, Robert B M Landewé, Sytske Anne Bergstra, Andreas Kerschbaumer, Alexandre Sepriano, Daniel Aletaha, Roberto Caporali, Christopher John Edwards, Kimme L Hyrich, Janet E Pope, Savia de Souza, Tanja A Stamm, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Patrick Verschueren, Kevin L Winthrop, Alejandro Balsa, Joan M Bathon, Maya H Buch, Gerd R Burmester, Frank Buttgereit, Mario Humberto Cardiel, Katerina Chatzidionysiou, Catalin Codreanu, Maurizio Cutolo, Alfons A den Broeder, Khadija El Aoufy, Axel Finckh, João Eurico Fonseca, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Espen A Haavardsholm, Annamaria Iagnocco, Kim Lauper, Zhanguo Li, Iain B McInnes, Eduardo F Mysler, Peter Nash, Gyula Poor, Gorica G Ristic, Felice Rivellese, Andrea Rubbert-Roth, Hendrik Schulze-Koops, Nikolay Stoilov, Anja Strangfeld, Annette van der Helm-van Mil, Elsa van Duuren, Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland, René Westhovens, Désirée van der Heijde, M. L. Marques, S. Ramiro, M. Van Lunteren, R. Stal, I. J. Berg, K. Minde Fagerli, M. Van Oosterhout, S. Exarchou, R. Ramonda, M. G. H. Van de Sande, R. B. M. Landewé, D. Van der Heijde, F. A. Van Gaalen |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 16 | 11% |
| Spain | 14 | 9% |
| Colombia | 11 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 6 | 4% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Paraguay | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 83 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 125 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 11% |
| Scientists | 8 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 462 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 89 | 19% |
| Other | 51 | 11% |
| Researcher | 42 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 95 | 20% |
| Unknown | 111 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 92 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 29 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 11% |
| Unknown | 123 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#163,824
of 24,518,979 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#64
of 7,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,685
of 432,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,518,979 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.