↓ Skip to main content

Anti-D administration after spontaneous miscarriage for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-D administration after spontaneous miscarriage for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009617.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laxminarayan Karanth, Sharifah Halimah Jaafar, Sachchithanantham Kanagasabai, N S Nair, Ankur Barua

Abstract

During pregnancy, a Rhesus-negative (Rh-negative) woman may develop antibodies if her fetus is Rh-positive, which can cause fetal morbidity or mortality in following pregnancies, if untreated.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 9 10%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Unspecified 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 11 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,098,472
of 14,091,368 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,835
of 10,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,761
of 149,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,091,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.