You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Community Perspectives on Simulation and Data Needs for the Study of Natural Hazard Impacts and Recovery
Natural Hazards Review, February 2023
Adam Zsarnóczay, Gregory G. Deierlein, Caroline J. Williams, Tracy L. Kijewski-Correa, Ann-Margaret Esnard, Laura N. Lowes, Laurie Johnson
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||7||78%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||11%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||21%|
|Student > Master||2||14%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||7%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards Review
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 428,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards Review
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them