↓ Skip to main content

Impacts and management of feral cats Felis catus in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Mammal Review, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 309)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
164 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacts and management of feral cats Felis catus in Australia
Published in
Mammal Review, November 2016
DOI 10.1111/mam.12080
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Chris R. Dickman, Chris N. Johnson, Sarah M. Legge, Euan G. Ritchie, John C. Z. Woinarski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2019.
All research outputs
#76,890
of 12,694,814 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Review
#9
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,436
of 370,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Review
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,694,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them