↓ Skip to main content

RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3), a rheumatoid arthritis index without formal joint counts for routine care: proposed severity categories compared to disease activity score and…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Rheumatology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3), a rheumatoid arthritis index without formal joint counts for routine care: proposed severity categories compared to disease activity score and clinical disease activity index categories.
Published in
Journal of Rheumatology, November 2008
DOI 10.3899/jrheum.080182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theodore Pincus, Christopher J Swearingen, Martin Bergman, Yusuf Yazici

Abstract

To compare 4 categories (high, moderate, and low severity, and near-remission) of RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3), an index without formal joint counts, which is scored in < 10 seconds to 4 categories of the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 136 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 23 16%
Other 19 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,623,019
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rheumatology
#704
of 3,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,071
of 105,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rheumatology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.