↓ Skip to main content

Social Media and the Patient Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Radiology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
83 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Media and the Patient Experience
Published in
Journal of the American College of Radiology, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Matthew Hawkins, Andrew J. DeLaO, Colin Hung

Abstract

As patients continue to turn to online resources for health care information to guide their care decisions, it is becoming increasingly important for radiologists to engage with patients online via social media platforms. There are many ways physicians can use social media to provide patients with valuable information and improve the overall patient experience. By optimizing online discoverability, curating radiology content, engaging with patient communities, and producing mineable social media content, radiologists can emerge as thought leaders in this new form of patient-centered communication and information exchange.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 22%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Other 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 19%
Computer Science 9 8%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 23 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#400,216
of 15,342,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#85
of 2,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,549
of 387,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#9
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,342,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.