↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Administrative Data Finds Endoscopist Quality Measures Associated With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
448 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Administrative Data Finds Endoscopist Quality Measures Associated With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer
Published in
Gastroenterology, January 2011
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy N. Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Shawn S. Forbes, Lawrence F. Paszat, Refik Saskin, Linda Rabeneck

Abstract

Most quality indicators for colonoscopy measure processes; little is known about their relationship to patient outcomes. We investigated whether characteristics of endoscopists, determined from administrative data, are associated with development of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC).

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Ecuador 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 16%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,276,810
of 24,479,790 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#2,031
of 12,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,952
of 188,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#7
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,479,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.