↓ Skip to main content

Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004284.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludovic Reveiz, José-Ramón Rueda, Andrés Felipe Cardona

Abstract

This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 2, 2008 of The Cochrane Library. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) constitute about 80% of all lung cancer cases. Although surgery is the only curative treatment of NSCLC, fewer than 20% of tumors can be radically resected. Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment modalities in lung cancer, contributing to both its cure and palliation. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) has been used as one approach to improve local control either alone or in combination with other treatments.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Psychology 6 10%
Computer Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 12 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,027,882
of 14,229,176 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,919
of 10,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,117
of 150,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,229,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.