You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disparate Discrimination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Michigan Law Review, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.36644/mlr.121.1.disparate |
| Authors |
Leah Litman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 52 | 41% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Comoros | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chad | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 112 | 88% |
| Scientists | 9 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#438,353
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Michigan Law Review
#4
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,627
of 518,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Michigan Law Review
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them