↓ Skip to main content

Self-control and problematic mobile phone use in Chinese college students: the mediating role of mobile phone use patterns

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-control and problematic mobile phone use in Chinese college students: the mediating role of mobile phone use patterns
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1131-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhaocai Jiang, Xiuxin Zhao

Abstract

With the popularity of mobile phones, problematic mobile phone use is getting increasing attention in recent years. Although self-control was found to be a critical predictor of problematic mobile phone use, no study has ever explored the association between self-control and mobile phone use patterns as well as the possible pathway how self-control affects problematic mobile phone use. Four hundred sixty-eight college students were randomly selected in this study. Data were collected using the Problematic Mobile Phone Use Scale, the Self-Control Scale, and the Mobile Phone Use Pattern Questionnaire. Statistical tests were conducted to identify the potential role of mobile phone use patterns in the association between self-control and problematic mobile phone use. In this sample, female students displayed significant higher mobile phone dependence than males. Self-control was negatively correlated with interpersonal, transaction and entertainment mobile phone use patterns, but positively correlated with information seeking use pattern. Self-control could predict problematic mobile phone use directly and indirectly via interpersonal and transaction patterns. Our research provided additional evidence for the negative association between self-control and problematic mobile phone use. Moreover, interpersonal and transaction use patterns played a mediating role in this link.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 195 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Lecturer 8 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 93 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Computer Science 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 97 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,355,479
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,234
of 4,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#348,883
of 415,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#79
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.