↓ Skip to main content

Revisión sistemática de la exactitud diagnóstica de la gota gruesa en comparación con la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa, para malaria asociada al embarazo, 2010-2022

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revisión sistemática de la exactitud diagnóstica de la gota gruesa en comparación con la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa, para malaria asociada al embarazo, 2010-2022
Published in
Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, September 2022
DOI 10.17843/rpmesp.2022.393.11739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roxana Gómez-Hoyos, Jaiberth Antonio Cardona-Arias, Luis Felipe Higuita Gutiérrez, Walter Salas-Zapata, Jaime Carmona-Fonseca

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,805,293
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#236
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,754
of 441,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.