You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cell plasticity in wound healing: paracrine factors of M1/ M2 polarized macrophages influence the phenotypical state of dermal fibroblasts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Communication and Signaling, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-811x-11-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diana TA Ploeger, Nynke A Hosper, Martin Schipper, Jasper A Koerts, Saskia de Rond, Ruud A Bank |
| Abstract |
Macrophages and fibroblasts are two major players in tissue repair and fibrosis. Despite the relevance of macrophages and fibroblasts in tissue homeostasis, remarkably little is known whether macrophages are able to influence the properties of fibroblasts. Here we investigated the role of paracrine factors secreted by classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) human macrophages on human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 314 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 11% |
| Unknown | 70 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 6% |
| Engineering | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cell Communication and Signaling
#270
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,795
of 210,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Communication and Signaling
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.