You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
GTF2I mutation in micronodular thymoma with lymphoid stroma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Pathology, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jcp-2022-208655 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Bille, Katherine Fryer, Andrew Wallace, Daisuke Nonaka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| Morocco | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,809,941
of 23,642,687 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#384
of 3,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,177
of 451,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,642,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.