↓ Skip to main content

Psychological treatments for common mental health problems experienced by informal carers of adults with chronic physical health conditions (Protocol)

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological treatments for common mental health problems experienced by informal carers of adults with chronic physical health conditions (Protocol)
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Woodford, Paul Farrand, David Richards, David J Llewellyn

Abstract

Improved life expectancy is resulting in increased outpatient treatment of people with chronic physical health conditions and reliance on the provision of informal care in the community. However, informal care is also associated with increased risk of experiencing common mental health difficulties such as depression and anxiety. Currently there is a lack of evidence-based treatments for such difficulties, resulting in poor health outcomes for both the informal carer and care recipient.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 43 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,804,687
of 12,440,173 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#795
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,189
of 145,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,173 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.