The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effectiveness of policies for reducing dietary trans fat: a systematic review of the evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.2471/blt.12.111468 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shauna M Downs, Anne Marie Thow, Stephen R Leeder |
Abstract |
To systematically review evidence for the effectiveness of policies, including self-regulation, aimed at reducing industrially produced trans fatty acids (TFAs) in food. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Belgium | 1 | 7% |
Ireland | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Morocco | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Suriname | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 226 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 57 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
Researcher | 20 | 9% |
Other | 16 | 7% |
Other | 40 | 17% |
Unknown | 37 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 9% |
Psychology | 9 | 4% |
Other | 38 | 16% |
Unknown | 47 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,483,657
of 26,542,140 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#412
of 3,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,876
of 296,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#6
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,542,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.