↓ Skip to main content

Protocol for a systematic review of prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: an update of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force findings

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol for a systematic review of prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: an update of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force findings
Published in
Systematic Reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-1-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Cancelliere, J David Cassidy, Pierre Côté, Cesar A Hincapié, Jan Hartvigsen, Linda J Carroll, Connie Marras, Eleanor Boyle, Vicki Kristman, Ryan Hung, Britt-Marie Stålnacke, Peter Rumney, Victor Coronado, Lena W Holm, Jörgen Borg, Catharina Nygren-de Boussard, Jean-Luc af Geijerstam, Michelle Keightley

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is a major public-health concern and represents 70-90% of all treated traumatic brain injuries. The last best-evidence synthesis, conducted by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Neurotrauma, Prevention, Management and Rehabilitation in 2002, found few quality studies on prognosis. The objective of this review is to update these findings. Specifically, we aim to describe the course, identify modifiable prognostic factors, determine long-term sequelae, and identify effects of interventions for MTBI. Finally, we will identify gaps in the literature, and make recommendations for future research.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 120 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Other 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 39%
Psychology 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 15 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2012.
All research outputs
#2,904,005
of 3,628,302 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#233
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,682
of 84,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.