↓ Skip to main content

『四つの署名』か『4の手話』か Lost in Translation 1

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
『四つの署名』か『4の手話』か Lost in Translation 1
Published in
Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies, December 2021
DOI 10.7877/jasl.30.1_18
Authors

佐野 正信

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,762,227
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,754
of 507,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them