The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Work hardening behavior and fracture mechanisms of Fe-18Mn-1.3C-2Cr low-density steel castings with varying proportions of aluminum alloying
|
---|---|
Published in |
Materials Science & Engineering: A, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.msea.2022.144467 |
Authors |
Zhi-bin Zheng, Hao-kun Yang, A.P. Shatrava, Jun Long, Yu-hui Wang, Jia-xin Li, Kai-hong Zheng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 33% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 2 | 22% |
Materials Science | 1 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,039,521
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Materials Science & Engineering: A
#108
of 2,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,521
of 487,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Science & Engineering: A
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.