You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Cough Algorithm for Chronic Cough in Children: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatrics, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1542/peds.2012-3318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Bernadette Chang, Colin Francis Robertson, Peter Paul van Asperen, Nicholas John Glasgow, Ian Brent Masters, Laurel Teoh, Craig Michael Mellis, Louis Isaac Landau, Julie Maree Marchant, Peter Stanley Morris |
| Abstract |
The goals of this study were to: (1) determine if management according to a standardized clinical management pathway/algorithm (compared with usual treatment) improves clinical outcomes by 6 weeks; and (2) assess the reliability and validity of a standardized clinical management pathway for chronic cough in children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Malawi | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 29 | 26% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,385,939
of 22,639,270 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#4,145
of 16,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,927
of 192,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#80
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,639,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.