You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Wood decay fungi and their bacterial interaction partners in the built environment – A systematic review on fungal bacteria interactions in dead wood and timber
Fungal Biology Reviews, September 2023
Julia Embacher, Susanne Zeilinger, Martin Kirchmair, Luis M. Rodriguez-R, Sigrid Neuhauser
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Iran, Islamic Republic of||1||5%|
|Members of the public||7||37%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||16%|
|Student > Master||3||16%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||37%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||11%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||11%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,229,740 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Biology Reviews
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 84,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Biology Reviews
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,229,740 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.