You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating quality improvement at scale: A pilot study on routine reporting for executive board governance in a UK National Health Service organisation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evaluation & Program Planning, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102222 |
| Authors |
Kia-Chong Chua, Claire Henderson, Barbara Grey, Michael Holland, Nick Sevdalis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 46% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 72% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,559,246
of 24,641,327 outputs
Outputs from Evaluation & Program Planning
#75
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,255
of 406,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evaluation & Program Planning
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.