↓ Skip to main content

The six-minute walk test is an excellent predictor of functional ambulation after total knee arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The six-minute walk test is an excellent predictor of functional ambulation after total knee arthroplasty
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Ko, Justine Marie Naylor, Ian Andrew Harris, Jack Crosbie, Anthony ET Yeo

Abstract

The Six-minute walk (6 MW) and Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) are short walk tests commonly used to evaluate functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, little is known about walking capacity of TKA recipients over extended periods typical of everyday living and whether these short walk tests actually predict longer, more functional distances. Further, short walk tests only correlate moderately with patient-reported outcomes. The overarching aims of this study were to compare the performance of TKA recipients in an extended walk test to healthy age-matched controls and to determine the utility of this extended walk test as a research tool to evaluate longer term functional mobility in TKA recipients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 212 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 59 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 15%
Sports and Recreations 17 8%
Engineering 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 73 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,079,029
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,386
of 4,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,165
of 195,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#34
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.