The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mabea dalyana (Euphorbiaceae-Hippomaneae): a new subshrub with xylopodia endemic to the savannas of the Brazilian Amazon
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Botanica Brasilica, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1590/0102-33062021abb0039 |
Authors |
Narcisio C. Bigio, Ricardo de S. Secco, Hans-Joachim Esser, Daniel Borini Alves, Antônio Laffayete Pires da Silveira, Rubens Sousa Ramos, Cassiane Barroso dos Anjos, Késia da Silva Gonçalves |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
Researcher | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,372,970
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#7
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,775
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.