↓ Skip to main content

Referral to Chinese medicine practitioners in Australian primary care: a survey of New South Wales rural and regional general practitioners

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Referral to Chinese medicine practitioners in Australian primary care: a survey of New South Wales rural and regional general practitioners
Published in
Chinese Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1749-8546-8-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan L Wardle, David W Sibbritt, Jon Adams

Abstract

Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs) play an important part in rural and regional Australian healthcare. A survey was conducted to investigate referral practices between Chinese medicine (CM) and conventional primary health care practitioners in this region.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,832,749
of 13,338,904 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#55
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,367
of 148,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,338,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them