You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sugarcane yeast with urea in replace of soybean meal in the diet of Murrah buffaloes does not cause metabolic, endocrine, and mineral disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tropical Animal Health and Production, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11250-023-03452-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruna Higino de Souza Silva, Rebeka Menezes Pontes, Ayna Arramis Apolinário da Silva, Esdras Lima de Carvalho Gueiros, Emanuel Felipe de Oliveira Filho, Daniel da Silva Praia, Daniel Nunes de Araújo Gonçalves, Tomás Guilherme Pereira da Silva, Ricardo Alexandre Silva Pessoa, Cláudio Coutinho Bartolomeu, Pierre Castro Soares |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,682,052
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#510
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,275
of 435,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.