You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supporting all breaths versus supporting some breaths during synchronised mechanical ventilation in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324464 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dushyant Batra, Dulip Jaysainghe, Nihit Batra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 31% |
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,469,987
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#171
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,470
of 478,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.