↓ Skip to main content

Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines — A Cautionary Tale

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
122 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
6545 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
8 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines — A Cautionary Tale
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, January 2023
DOI 10.1056/nejmp2215780
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul A. Offit

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,545 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4568. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#865
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#82
of 30,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19
of 329,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 118.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.