↓ Skip to main content

Ellenberg‐type indicator values for European vascular plant species

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Vegetation Science, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,360)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
71 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ellenberg‐type indicator values for European vascular plant species
Published in
Journal of Vegetation Science, January 2023
DOI 10.1111/jvs.13168
Authors

Lubomír Tichý, Irena Axmanová, Jürgen Dengler, Riccardo Guarino, Florian Jansen, Gabriele Midolo, Michael P. Nobis, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Svetlana Aćić, Fabio Attorre, Erwin Bergmeier, Idoia Biurrun, Gianmaria Bonari, Helge Bruelheide, Juan Antonio Campos, Andraž Čarni, Alessandro Chiarucci, Mirjana Ćuk, Renata Ćušterevska, Yakiv Didukh, Daniel Dítě, Zuzana Dítě, Tetiana Dziuba, Giuliano Fanelli, Eduardo Fernández‐Pascual, Emmanuel Garbolino, Rosario G. Gavilán, Jean‐Claude Gégout, Ulrich Graf, Behlül Güler, Michal Hájek, Stephan M. Hennekens, Ute Jandt, Anni Jašková, Borja Jiménez‐Alfaro, Philippe Julve, Stephan Kambach, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Gerhard Karrer, Ali Kavgacı, Ilona Knollová, Anna Kuzemko, Filip Küzmič, Flavia Landucci, Attila Lengyel, Jonathan Lenoir, Corrado Marcenò, Jesper Erenskjold Moeslund, Pavel Novák, Aaron Pérez‐Haase, Tomáš Peterka, Remigiusz Pielech, Alessandro Pignatti, Valerijus Rašomavičius, Solvita Rūsiņa, Arne Saatkamp, Urban Šilc, Željko Škvorc, Jean‐Paul Theurillat, Thomas Wohlgemuth, Milan Chytrý

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 43 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 27%
Environmental Science 21 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 48 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,090,496
of 26,760,626 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vegetation Science
#12
of 1,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,162
of 496,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vegetation Science
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,760,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,360 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them