↓ Skip to main content

Social determinants of health and seasonal influenza vaccination in adults ≥65 years: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
255 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social determinants of health and seasonal influenza vaccination in adults ≥65 years: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative data
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason M Nagata, Isabel Hernández-Ramos, Anand Sivasankara Kurup, Daniel Albrecht, Claudia Vivas-Torrealba, Carlos Franco-Paredes

Abstract

Vaccination against influenza is considered the most important public health intervention to prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and premature deaths related to influenza in the elderly, though there are significant inequities among global influenza vaccine resources, capacities, and policies. The objective of this study was to assess the social determinants of health preventing adults ≥ 65 years old from accessing and accepting seasonal influenza vaccination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 303 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 24%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Other 16 5%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 63 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 23%
Social Sciences 37 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 90 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,381,432
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,513
of 15,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,366
of 195,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#105
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.