You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
水俣病と水銀条約
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Material Cycles and Waste Management Research, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3985/mcwmr.22.337 |
| Authors |
原田 正純 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 37% |
| Unknown | 17 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,896,733
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Material Cycles and Waste Management Research
#1
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,927
of 193,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Material Cycles and Waste Management Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 34 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them