You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Isotopic anthropology of rural German medieval diet: intra- and inter-population variability
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, November 2016
Karyn C. Olsen, Christine D. White, Fred J. Longstaffe, Frank J. Rühli, Christina Warinner, Domingo C. Salazar-García
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||4||15%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||11%|
|Student > Master||3||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Arts and Humanities||5||19%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||11%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||11%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||11%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2016.
All research outputs
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 415,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.