↓ Skip to main content

GR 43175: A preferential 5‐HT1D agent in monkey and human brains as shown by autoradiography

Overview of attention for article published in Synapse, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GR 43175: A preferential 5‐HT1D agent in monkey and human brains as shown by autoradiography
Published in
Synapse, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/syn.890040212
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Waeber, D. Hoyer, J. M. Palacios

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 1999.
All research outputs
#8,232,822
of 24,662,675 outputs
Outputs from Synapse
#244
of 836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,171
of 68,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synapse
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,662,675 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.