↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features—randomized clinical study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Investigations, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features—randomized clinical study
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00784-019-03034-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miroslav Dragovic, Marko Pejovic, Jelena Stepic, Snjezana Colic, Branko Dozic, Svetlana Dragovic, Milos Lazarevic, Nadja Nikolic, Jelena Milasin, Biljana Milicic

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 61 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 68 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#320
of 1,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,519
of 345,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.