↓ Skip to main content

Locoregional Failure During and After Short-course Radiotherapy followed by Chemotherapy and Surgery Compared to Long-course Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery – A Five-year Follow-up of the RAPIDO Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
193 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Locoregional Failure During and After Short-course Radiotherapy followed by Chemotherapy and Surgery Compared to Long-course Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery – A Five-year Follow-up of the RAPIDO Trial
Published in
Annals of Surgery, January 2023
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000005799
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esmée A. Dijkstra, Per J. Nilsson, Geke A.P. Hospers, Renu R. Bahadoer, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, Annet G.H. Roodvoets, Hein Putter, Åke Berglund, Andrés Cervantes, Rogier M.P.H. Crolla, Mathijs P. Hendriks, Jaume Capdevila, Ibrahim Edhemovic, Corrie A.M. Marijnen, Cornelis J.H. van de Velde, Bengt Glimelius, Boudewijn van Etten

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 193 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 19 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#305,697
of 24,547,718 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#127
of 8,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,207
of 449,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#2
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,547,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.