↓ Skip to main content

A BRIEF COGNITIVE‐BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION FOR TREATING DEPRESSION AND PANIC DISORDER IN PATIENTS WITH NONCARDIAC CHEST PAIN: A 24‐WEEK RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Overview of attention for article published in Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A BRIEF COGNITIVE‐BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION FOR TREATING DEPRESSION AND PANIC DISORDER IN PATIENTS WITH NONCARDIAC CHEST PAIN: A 24‐WEEK RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Published in
Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), April 2013
DOI 10.1002/da.22106
Pubmed ID
Authors

van Beek MH, Oude Voshaar RC, Beek AM, van Zijderveld GA, Visser S, Speckens AE, Batelaan N, van Balkom AJ, Beek, M.H.C.T., Oude Voshaar, R.C., Beek, A.M., Zijderveld, G.A., Visser, S., Speckens, A.E.M., Batelaan, N., Balkom, A.J.L.M., M.H.C.T. van Beek, R.C. Oude Voshaar, A.M. Beek, G.A. van Zijderveld, S. Visser, A.E.M. Speckens, N. Batelaan, A.J.L.M. van Balkom

Abstract

Most patients with noncardiac chest pain experience anxiety and depressive symptoms. Commonly they are reassured and referred back to primary care, leaving them undiagnosed and untreated. Some small studies have suggested efficacy of 12 cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) sessions. Our aim was to examine efficacy of brief CBT in reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with noncardiac chest pain and comorbid panic and/or depressive disorders.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 32%
Student > Bachelor 8 32%
Researcher 8 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 24%
Other 12 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 88%
Psychology 17 68%
Unspecified 5 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Other 3 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2013.
All research outputs
#2,628,829
of 11,264,908 outputs
Outputs from Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269)
#415
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,979
of 128,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269)
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,264,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.